Template talk:Test3a

This redirect was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on 20 September 2024. The result of the discussion was keep.

Edit to template

Could an admin add {{TestTemplatesNotice}} to the template (obviously in a <noinclude> section)? Several other templates on {{TestTemplates}} have them, and it'd be nice to have this sort of standardized. EVula 17:41, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to adding the above, please could someone add the if statement that checks for the article name? At the moment the following doesn't do anything unlike most other similar templates: {{subst:test3a|Example}}

{{Test3}} is a good template to refer to for the relevant code, if you need it. — blobglob talk 01:10, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm more than happy to fulfill my own request, sure, but I've also made the #if code. EVula // talk // ☯ // 02:54, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, thanks! — blobglob talk 03:29, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

tdf

{{editprotected}} Please add the below to the top of the pgae.

<noinclude>{{Tfd|{{subst:PAGENAME}}}}</noinclude>

--Bsherr (talk) 14:27, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've speedily closed the TfD listing, so this is not needed. —David Levy 16:55, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 7 April 2015

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add <noinclude>{{subst:Template for discussion|heading=Old Test Edit Warnings}}</noinclude> to the top of the page. Thanks! EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 18:59, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Redrose64 (talk) 09:08, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 9 February 2016

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

This template and many of the others listed at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2015_April_26#Old_Test_Edit_Warnings still have TfD tags on them. Please implement the redirects according to the discussion results. Also, some of the old templates-to-be-redirected are not protected; should they be? 15.211.201.88 (talk) 01:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done /

Not done Template removed, that discussion isn't very clears as to WHERE this should be redirected, pinging closing admin to come clean this up: @Plastikspork: — xaosflux ^Talk 04:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully EoRdE6 can provide some suggestions for the redirect targets. Thanks! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Plastikspork: Well it's been 3 months, and I was bold and redirected the pages according to the suggestions at the closed TfD discussion. I'm redirecting this page to {{uw-delete3}} per suggestion, since the phrasing on this template is about removal of content. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 01:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]