Template talk:Taxonomy/Pancrustacea
 | Template:Taxonomy/Pancrustacea is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here.
|
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Template-protected edit request on 23 April 2023
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Iezer (talk) 09:13, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Can the parent taxon be changed to Mandibulata?--Iezer (talk) 09:13, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit template-protected}}template. This does not appear to be an uncontroversial request. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:40, 23 April 2023 (UTC)- Where is there controversy on this? Mlvluu (talk) 14:33, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Unless somehow Uniramia still exists, it’s uncontroversial. Plus, Tactopoda isn’t very certain either… IC1101-Capinatator (talk) 15:08, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 12 July 2024
[edit]Since the first “add Mandibulata” request was denied because it’s “controversial”, I’m going to make another one. After all, since Wikipedia doesn’t support Uniramia, and even Tactopoda isn’t particularly certain, I feel like Mandibulata should be added as a parent, and Tactopoda removed. IC1101-Capinatator (talk) 09:13, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Partly done: – there is sufficient consensus to change parent to Mandibulata; however, since removal of Tactopoda was not part of the original request, a stronger consensus is needed to effect that change. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 13:26, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 29 April 2023
[edit]Can |always_display=yes be added to this? I think it probably warrants it. Sailor Ceres (talk) 19:58, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Sailor Ceres:, that would result in Pancrustacea being displayed on articles for e.g. every insect species. Do you really think that is a good idea? I don't. Plantdrew (talk) 22:05, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Plantdrew Good point. I was actually just trying to find a way to get it to display on Diplura, Protura, and Springtail. Any idea how I could get that to work? Sailor Ceres (talk) 22:07, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Sailor Ceres: Ok, those are indeed articles where it would be reasonable to display Pancrustacea. You can accomplish that by adding a display_parents parameter to each of those. Add "| display_parents = 2" (without the quotes) to the taxoboxes, preferably placed immediately above the taxon parameter (parameter order doesn't technically matter, but it is more convenient for future editors if the parameters are placed in a mostly consistent order). Plantdrew (talk) 22:12, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Plantdrew Thank you so much! Sailor Ceres (talk) 22:21, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Sailor Ceres: Ok, those are indeed articles where it would be reasonable to display Pancrustacea. You can accomplish that by adding a display_parents parameter to each of those. Add "| display_parents = 2" (without the quotes) to the taxoboxes, preferably placed immediately above the taxon parameter (parameter order doesn't technically matter, but it is more convenient for future editors if the parameters are placed in a mostly consistent order). Plantdrew (talk) 22:12, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Plantdrew Good point. I was actually just trying to find a way to get it to display on Diplura, Protura, and Springtail. Any idea how I could get that to work? Sailor Ceres (talk) 22:07, 29 April 2023 (UTC)