Template talk:AfC submission
(Redirected from Template talk:Submit)
 | This is not the page to contribute new articles.
This page is for discussion of the "AFC submission" template itself, and its subpages. You may be looking for one of the following pages:
|
 | Template:AfC submission is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here. |
| This is the talk page for discussing AfC submission and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 6 months  |
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | To help centralize discussions and keep related topics together, all talkpages of sub-templates redirect here. For general discussion about the WikiProject, please see WT:WPAFC. |
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:IRC help disclaimer § Switch default IRC web client. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 00:46, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
What if something goes wrong?🤨
[edit]
well what if something goes wrong with submitting? Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 22:34, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- You ask for help. Primefac (talk) 22:41, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Edit request 18 November 2024
[edit] | This edit request to Template:AfC submission/comments has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change: The text of the link to the notability criteria in the web declination statement states it links to the notability criteria for websites. But, this declination statement and the linked WP:NWEB guideline is used for all web-based content, not just websites. The updated text should reduce confusion when declining a submission that is web-based but not a website.
Diff:
| − | This submission's references do not show that the subject [[Wikipedia:Notability|qualifies for a Wikipedia article]]—that is, they do not show ''significant'' coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ''published'', [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|''reliable'']], [[Wikipedia:No_original_research#Secondary|''secondary'']] sources that are ''[[Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent]]'' of the subject (see the [[Wikipedia:Notability (web)|guidelines on the notability of | + | This submission's references do not show that the subject [[Wikipedia:Notability|qualifies for a Wikipedia article]]—that is, they do not show ''significant'' coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ''published'', [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|''reliable'']], [[Wikipedia:No_original_research#Secondary|''secondary'']] sources that are ''[[Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent]]'' of the subject (see the [[Wikipedia:Notability (web)|guidelines on the notability of web content]]). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see [[Help:Referencing for beginners|technical help]] and learn about [[Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability)|mistakes to avoid]] when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. |
cyberdog958Talk 09:08, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
Completed. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 10:18, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
Edit request 20 November 2024
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change: Implement the ai/llm decline message currently in Template:AfC submission/comments/sandbox, per consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation#Current draft text.
Diff:
| − | + | |ai|llm = Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a [[large language model]], such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:<br />
* [[WP:NOTPROMO|Promotional tone]], [[MOS:EDITORIAL|editorializing]], and other [[WP:WTW|words to watch]]
* [[WP:VAGUE|Vague]], generic, and [[WP:CRYSTAL|speculative statements]] extrapolated from similar subjects
* [[WP:NOTESSAY|Essay-like writing]]
* [[Hallucination (artificial intelligence)|Hallucinations]] (plausible-sounding, but false information) and [[WP:FAKE|non-existent references]]
* [[WP:Close paraphrasing|Close paraphrasing]]<br />
Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See [[Wikipedia:Large language models|our help page on large language models]]. |
Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 17:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done * Pppery * it has begun... 04:47, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- I submitted a ticket in AfC helper to support this option Ca talk to me! 06:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Made a pull request for it, it should be reviewed soon! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 07:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)