This template was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This template was accepted on 20 January 2014 by reviewer LukeSurl (talk·contribs).
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
For how to use this banner template, see its documentation.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
That wouldn't be helpful for anyone using the navbox. If we're going to have this navbox, the sharks need to stay there. They are the defining part of the show, not the products. --Tavix(talk)15:55, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
By your reasoning then, the navbox should be deleted. The "sharks" shouldn't be included as if we were to include this navbox on their respective pages, it would put WP:UNDUE weight on this small aspect of their careers. --Rob Sinden (talk) 16:18, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I'd support deletion of the navbox over keeping the navbox without the sharks. It makes zero sense to have this navbox and not include the sharks. I disagree about the WP:UNDUE weight comment, this is not a small aspect of most of their careers (the "guest sharks" aside). --Tavix(talk)16:24, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]