Template talk:S-par/us-sen

Template-protected edit request on 23 April 2019

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please append <noinclude>{{documentation}}</noinclude> to allow non-template editors to create documentation for this template - it is currently uncategorized, among other things. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 02:26, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done DannyS712, Please check this one over before we tackle the others. Cabayi (talk) 05:25, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Cabayi: I'm not an expert in succession boxes, but as far as I can tell it went great. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 05:51, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DannyS712, not quite 100%. There's a template loop in the doc. Cabayi (talk) 05:52, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Cabayi: There is? I don't see it... --DannyS712 (talk) 05:53, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DannyS712, found it (need more coffee) and it's obscure... Template:S-par is OK, Template:S-par/doc is OK, but viewing the doc at Template:S-par/us-sen shows the template loop for those sub-templates which have their own /doc instead of the /doc being a redirect to S-par/doc. Another coffee and then I'll sort them out. Cabayi (talk) 11:15, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Cabayi: I can't see any template loops - I'll take your word for it. Thanks for tracking that down --DannyS712 (talk) 16:28, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DannyS712, It was the templates which were using Template:S-par/item. I've switched them to the bare link and it seems to be working - Currently 40ish transclusions waiting to be flushed out. I'll crack on with your requests now. Cabayi (talk) 16:47, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Cabayi: Oh, thanks --DannyS712 (talk) 16:50, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]