This template is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This template is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This template is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Being as the Royal Air Force has had some of its major functions privatised (or operating under Private Finance Initiatives for long-term contracts), I suggest adding a new section for those civilian companies which provide such services to the RAF. The most obvious being AirTanker Services (27 year contract to operate the RAF Voyager multi-role tanker transport), Babcock International (various elements of the elementary flying training and military flying training programmes), and Serco (engineering and support services). Thoughts please. Militum professio scriniarii (talk) 18:12, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]