Template talk:Rose Royce

Album years

Support addition of years - Per the discussion here, which refers to an RFC, I added the years to this template. --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:30, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. There's no good reason to add the years, it's just clutter. Especially considering all the albums are numbered and listed chronologically. WP:RETAIN. Also, I'm amazed that that RFC was closed as "no consensus". --wooden superman 14:39, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A few of us were surprised at the outcome of the RfD, but it is what it is. I'm in favor of removing the release year of albums in navboxes (and was doing so) but I'm not going to argue over it one template at time. Take it to a new RfD or just live with the inconsistency. But Jax should not be re-adding years to those that have been without them since before the RfD, even if he created it. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:19, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reply - This template had years in it on 21 August 2014‎. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:27, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It hasn't had years for nearly four years. No justification to add them now. --wooden superman 11:15, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]