Template talk:Rolling stock of Russia

Trains Portal

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This template is supported by the By country series task force.

Russia: Technology & engineering / Economy

	Russia portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
	This template is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
	This template is supported by the economy of Russia task force.

Expansion

See ru:Список локомотивов и МВПС СССР и России List

templates:

for metro see ru:Шаблон:Вагоны_метро_России

Sf5xeplus (talk) 20:29, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removal

Removed · Südbahn Class 23 (old) in the absense of info.Sf5xeplus (talk) 14:42, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kyrillic vs. latin writing

Hi!

The lemmas on en:wiki of Russian rolling stock are written in latin letters. Therefore we should use in the template a different listing of the locomotive designations: instead of ВЛ80 (VL80) we should use VL80 (ВЛ80). What speaks against that? --High Contrast (talk) 10:12, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, but of course if there is no English article, then there isn't much of a need to show the Latin translitetation. David S. Lawyer 06:27, 30 January 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dlawyer (talk • contribs)

Link to Russian wiki ?

I've done this for a few locos. that had no article on them in the English wiki. But I suspect there are many more such cases. These need to be distinguished from the links to en:wiki since we want people to create an article in en: for them. I've prefixed links to the Russian wiki by ru (example ru:ВЛ15). But I haven't used the transliterated name such as VL15.

The reason for this is that anyone going to the Russian wiki webpage likely knows Russian (or at lease the Russian alphabet) and thus doesn't need the loco abbrev. transliterated.

Also, I at first tried to utilize the Russian icon (in Russian) but not only was it too long and in bold face (distracting) but it seemed to damage the conversion of the markup text. "Preview" was OK and the "save" results were OK but then when I would go to another page and then back to a loco page to look at the template, I saw the markup text in the template display. This problem went away after I stopped using the ru icon. So there are 3 reasons not to use the ru icon. Also, if one writes a link to the ru wiki without using a |, then an ru: is automatically added to the displayed text in the template. However for locos that have subscripts and/or superscripts in the designation, one must use |.

I don't have time to do this, but one could write a script program to automate this and use the script to call a browser (such as the very old lynx text browser) to test if there is such a page on the Russian wiki. If so, the markup :ru: would be automatically added, etc. Thus the entire template would be modified by the script and the work would consist of writing and debugging the script. There are lots of script languages such as bash, perl, and python. For this one could use command-line Linux, (which I have on another PC).David S. Lawyer 06:22, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Translations

Someone please translate:

Peter Horn User talk 15:50, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that our Russian friends appear to be blissfully unaware of the international metric symbols. See Metric system for some of these symbols. Peter Horn User talk 16:24, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Missing loco

Russian locomotive class LV is missing from the template. Peter Horn User talk 01:30, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Still waiting. @Extrapolaris: @Илья Драконов: Peter Horn User talk 16:43, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am on a wiki break till August. Ilya Drakonov (talk) 18:51, 12 June 2016 (UTC).[reply]

It's already there, as 'ЛВ', which redirects to Russian locomotive class LV. I'll change the link to go directly to that page with its English title presently. 2Q (talk) 23:00, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]