Template talk:Rights

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rights template.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1: 30 days

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles

Philosophy: Ethics / Social and political

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics
	Social and political philosophy

Scope creep

This template seems to be getting filled up with articles that are not about rights per se. I'm wondering if we should have some kind of clearer criteria for what exactly should and shouldn't be included in this template? --Pfhorrest (talk) 05:12, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Change from Men to Men inside the source please -- VladG145 (talk) 23:08, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Detailed changes from VladG145

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change from Men to Men please, because that way we can be directed into the men's rights sections of the category inside the rights template in a consistent manner whenever we click "Men" since it's the "Men's rights movement" that offers men's rights that people look for in the category, just like how the category of the rights template direct you to women's rights when you click "Women" inside the category VladG145 (talk) 01:39, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. ◢ Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 03:18, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with this because the men's rights movement is a very specific and controversial movement, that is largely anti-feminist. The men's movement includes the men's rights movement, but also covers pro-feminist men's advocacy movements and generally is the umbrella for all advocacy for men, and is thus the more neutral option for the linked-to article. PBZE (talk) 23:45, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]