Template talk:Pratt & Whitney aeroengines

Merge

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Result: No consensus to merge, and no explanation of what the nom even wanted to merge, or why. No respnse from nom after nearly a month. - BillCJ (talk) 07:02, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should merge most of the list from the Products section of Pratt & Whitney to here. Any objections? --Explodicle (T/C) 15:56, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not clear on what exactly are you wanting to merge? Do you want to add the rocket and marine engines (which some of the aeoroengine navboxes do list if they are aero-derivitive), or are you wanting to add the applications too? The former I'd support, the latter would make the navbox too big and unwieldy, and are generally what has been listed in the products section on the company page, not in the navboxes. - BillCJ (talk) 16:20, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Model numbers

I'd like to add a list of the JT, PT, and PW turbine engine models numbers so that we have a sequntial list of those designations, simalr to the RB list in the RR navbox. Hawever, that would probably make the navbox too big as it is now. One option is to splitt off the piston engines to ther own navbox, which would make some room for the new sections. Another option would be to have a list article for the designations, but I'd rather do it with a navbox. Any thoughts/suggestions? - BilCat (talk) 08:07, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]