Template talk:Pink Floyd

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pink Floyd template.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1: 28 days

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock articles

Pink Floyd

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Pink Floyd, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pink Floyd on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pink FloydWikipedia:WikiProject Pink FloydTemplate:WikiProject Pink FloydPink Floyd articles

This template was a past project collaboration.

To-do list:

Fair use

Add fair use rationale to all images and sound samples (all except images already labeled free use).
Re-size large images around to 300 pixels (all "fair use" images), other than album covers (already done).

Articles

Expand all articles to at least Start class. Some song stubs can't be expanded and should be redirected to the relevant album article. Use the "Interstellar Overdrive" article as an example when editing a song stub.
Expand all of the Floyd's studio album articles to at least GA status.
See COTM for monthly collabs.

Project building

Add WikiProject Pink Floyd banner {{WPFloyd}} to all appropriate Talk pages.
Personally invite quality editors working on Pink Floyd articles to join the project.

If you complete one of these tasks, please remove it from the list.

This article does not yet have a related to do list. If you can think of any ways to improve the article, why not create one?

RfC: Should the Pink Floyd singles template be restored?

The consensus is that the template should not be restored.
Cunard (talk) 09:22, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Should this template be restored? --Ilovetopaint (talk) 14:16, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Yes – {{Pink Floyd}} is ridiculously bloated and needs something to split off --Ilovetopaint (talk) 14:16, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No. It's not so cumbersome in this navbox. It should certainly not exist formatted in the way it is above with decade and year splits, which is incredibly cumbersome. It's fine as it is. See also this discussion. --Rob Sinden (talk) 15:02, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No the {{Pink Floyd}} is best place for this to go, unless people really want to remove it from the template and just replace it with a link to Pink Floyd discography#Singles. Leaving as is is my vote though. WikiVirusC^(talk) 00:17, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No - Leave as is. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:47, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Semi-protected edit request on 9 December 2020

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I think the Publius Enigma should be moved to "Related media and tributes" 2601:244:5580:A610:F1EC:3E6:C2BE:1215 (talk) 14:47, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Not really a media nor a tribute. ◢ Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 12:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]