Template talk:Philippine National Railways Metro Commuter Line

What format should be really followed?

Hi it has come to my attention that two users have their own versions of templates to be used in railway line articles namely @YLSS: and @Useddenim:. YLSS argues that the format currently used for this template is the "common format for all RDTs; LRT-1, MRT-2, and MRT-3 should also follow this". While on the other hand current format for Template:Manila Light Rail Transit System Line 1, Template:Manila Light Rail Transit System Line 2, and Template:Manila Metro Rail Transit System Line 3 follows the format by Useddenim. We need a confirmation on which is really the correct standard format and those involved may argue here so that we could truly achieve a standard railway template for all railway lines. Cheers! PhilippineRevolution (talk) 00:47, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No conflict here. The three diagrams cited above were created in a deprecated format by Jeromesandilanico and I had simply neglected to update them (before now—thanks for bringing this to my attention). Useddenim (talk) 00:56, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I think that clears things up and the three other templates should be revised. Thank You and Cheers! PhilippineRevolution (talk) 01:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for updating them ;) May I also note that since these RDTs are only used within infoboxes, navbars are only available via bottom parameter. YLSS (talk) 06:28, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dela Rosa-Carmona

Please add the expected San Pedro-Carmona Branch line, in anticipation of the introduction of Dela Rosa-Carmona shuttle announced for this year.

https://m.facebook.com/DOTrPH/posts/1186365421502592 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Philippine_National_Railways_stations (San Pedro-Carmona Branch)

Jpg0813 (talk) 11:11, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Line Diagram Too Complicated

Isn't the current diagram too complicated? I think that only the major river crossings should be included in this map. --Hiwilms (talk) 04:25, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree. It appears that Korean Rail Fan and DearPaulPH have been adding a lot of unnecessary information. Useddenim (talk) 04:35, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I actually don't mind reducing the templates into simpler designs as long as it is still recognizable. Uniformity has always been my goal so when Useddenim, reduced templates such as Template:Metro Manila Subway Line 9 stating for simplification purposes, I actually saw his point. Although should you want to fix, please just do it on your own time as I have other commitments outside Wikipedia. Thanks! Korean Rail Fan 04:47, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]