Template talk:National radio networks in Australia

National radio networks in Australia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles

Radio

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Untitled

This template is a rather awkward shape (leaves big white gaps on both sides) and it uses a bit too much 'bold. And I don't know that the centering is that great. Can we tweak it up a bit?

For that matter, some of the ones included seem a bit suss... pfctdayelise (translate?) 09:30, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Red FM

The link to Red FM in this template has been changed to Red FM (Australia). The Red FM page is a disambiguation page; there was no article about the Australian station there. (I have, however, now added a link/URL to the disambig. page for your Red FM.) --Ckatz 08:50, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of community and small comercial networks

Why? I'm sure there are good reasons, but it would have been good to see them mentioned here before most of this box was removed. 220.253.43.91 (talk) 07:03, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Answering my own question, looking at the code it appears to have been someone's mistake. 220.253.43.91 (talk) 07:06, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]