This template is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
@Dr. Blofeld: I see you created and have made subsequent edits to this template. I am curious, what do you think about changing "Odzala National Park" to "Odzala-Kokoua National Park", now that the Wikipedia article about the park has been moved? Inkian Jason (talk) 17:30, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The article may have moved, but its maintenance issues went with it. Questions over which template the article should show up in are meaningless if that article is undergoing WP:AFD for lack of references. Thus, the article's issues ought to be addressed before the template's issues are. Spintendo 17:58, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Spintendo: The article is not at AfD. Blocking this change to the template because the article may go to AfD is a flimsy argument. If you think it belongs there then go ahead and nominate it. And we've never excluded articles from templates and or wikilinking simply because they're of low quality. Besides, this is the RoC's largest and oldest national park [1]. -Indy beetle (talk) 22:11, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Now the article title for the park has been changed, it makes no sense for the template to link to a redirect. The reason for refusing a change to the template makes no sense. Here we have an editor who is takinga conservative approach to a potential conflict of interest, which is something that should be encouraged, not made more difficult. Jts1882 | talk18:01, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'd rather wait for a consensus decision on this discussion. However, I see nothing controversial in the proposed changes, which seem to follow the other articles on the English Wikipedia and avoid unnecessary redirects. I'll make the changes if there are no objections. Jts1882 | talk20:08, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I meant to come back to this and make the change if there were no objections. The proposed change reflects the name of the park used officially and by tourist companies so I see no reason for keeping the older name. Template changed. Jts1882 | talk14:50, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]