Template talk:Infobox NFL team

This template was considered for deletion on 2018 October 5. The result of the discussion was "no consensus".

Template description: Infobox for National Football League teams.

Associated templates

I created the following associated templates to help bypass the redirects for AFC and NFC.

Zzyzx11 (Talk) 21:18, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

can we add a line for "number of NFL / Super Bowl Championships" ??

Eventually, but it is currently low priority, especially since they are all currently listed in the lead section of all of the NFL team articles. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 07:57, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I recently added it now Zzyzx11 (Talk) 19:55, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

New additions

I add new fields for the previous team nicknames and affiliations, along with a seperate row to list league championships other than Super Bowls. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 15:47, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Revisions

I have reworked the current NFL Team infobox by expanding it. I have though only applied it to the Chicago Bears page as of now. To view the code visit Template:NFL team demo.

Note: I have proposed a way we can determine the Championships:

1920-1969: counts as an NFL Championship unless that team won a SB I-IV 1966-1969: AFL-NFL Super Bowl Championships: I-IV 1960-1969: AFL Championships unless that team won a superbowl which would fall under the AFL-NFL Super Bowl Championships 1970-present: Super Bowl Championships

Happyman22

With all respect, you are putting way too much data in the Template:NFL team demo. Testing possible combinations on different NFL team articles (especially the short ones like Atlanta Falcons), and both 800x600 and 1024x768 monitors, the length screws up the formatting of the images on the articles, and the season-by-season table. I suggest removing the retired numbers and hall of fame players as we do list them later in articles. Best. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 19:39, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- And yes, I know that Template:MLB infobox lists them, but they can get away with it because their articles are more developed. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 19:48, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I am willing to list the home fields on the infobox, and maybe the mascot and fight song, but I am very hesitant on putting everything but the kitchen sink on there. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 20:45, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you are saying. Thanks for taking my suggestions. As for in the future, we can keep the info boxes as they are now and maybe create something new in the article for retired numbers and hall of famers.

Happyman22

Another thing..why not keep the all-time record in there?

Also should we call the 1966-1970 as the AFL-NFL Super Bowl Championships because that's how they are referred by the NFL and by our own articles?

--Happyman22 01:58, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Here's what I have been doing so far:
- I am slowly adding data to the infobox, seeing how long in length they go. Another reason I want to do this is to get rid of those lists in the lead section because they really should not belong there.
- I use to have all-time records in the infobox, but I removed them after a couple of weeks into the 2005 season. Only some of the articles were being updated to reflect the results of the recently completed games (by various users and anonymous IPs), but most of them were not, and I was just too busy to update them all by myself. I plan to put them back maybe sometime after the regular season is over (updated, of course, with the results of the 2005 season).
- Yes, I am still having problems with the 1966-1970 AFL-NFL Super Bowl Championships. It further complicates matters when Super Bowl III was really the first one to official be called the "Super Bowl". So you get sites like the Pro Football Hall of Fame listing the Jets Super Bowl championship and the 1968 AFL Championship seperately [1], but other sites like Sportsline.com, that only lists the AFL championship but not the Super Bowl win. [2] Zzyzx11 (Talk) 03:01, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a general manager field so that information can be included on team pages. Spicy 15:01, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, will update each team's article. Spicy 15:03, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFL-NFL Super Bowl Championships, revisited

I added two new parameters, no_pre1970sb_champs and pre1970sb_champs, to indicate on the Packers, Jets, and Chiefs articles that these Super Bowls were won prior to the AFL-NFL Merger. Using a template conditional formula, they will toggle a footnote message similar to the content on http://www.packers.com/history/championships/ that they include the pre-merger Super Bowl wins in the Packers 12 overall championships. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 15:40, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have revisited this idea and on the History of NFL Championships franchise page, I reworked the table. After the subject was brought up to me by an AFL advocate, it came to me that the first four Super Bowl champions were not league but indeed world champions. That means that the 12-time Green Bay Packer world champion motto is only in effect because they won the first two super bowls, had they lost one or both of them, their motto would have to be 12-time NFL Champion, which it also states on their website. What I am asking for is if someone who is an expert at this infobox create an optional option for a world championship list above the league, conference, and division championship section of the Championships section on the team box to be applied to the three world championship teams. --Happyman22 04:56, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Too much data

Looking at the infobox, I feel like we should scale it back. There is way too much data on here. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 16:03, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like we should remove the radio broadcasters. There were objections mentioned on Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Chicago Bears/archive1 that "The Broadcasters section adds little encyclopedic value, and IMO should be removed." Zzyzx11 (Talk) 16:08, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Get rid of the Radio Broadcasters. I agree. I will get rid of it. Anyone object? --Happyman22 18:29, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming

Does anyone object renaming the League titles section to Championships since all the championships are called championships like division championships? --Happyman22 18:36, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Retired Numbers

How about adding the option of placing retired numbers by the franchises in the info box, but making the feature optional so users can add it to each franchise if they wish. I would like to add it to the Chicago Bears article because as it looks now the article ends with too many tables and I believe will never achieve feature status if it looks like it looks now.

I do not agree for two reasons: Again, the infobox is a little too long as it is. But also, you open up the pandora's box with those teams such as the Ravens and Cowboys which do not officially retire jerseys, but do "retire" players into their Ring of Honor/Fame. Then you have caveats like the Bills, Dolphins, Bengals, Steelers, and the Lions that have some unofficially retired numbers. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 19:43, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Besides, I am quite surprised about your concern about how the Chicago Bears ends - although I will admit I do not know what the current culture is on FAC. This was the version when Arsenal_F.C. was promoted. And this was the version when New England Patriots was promoted. As you can see, there are very simple bulleted lists at the end, which in my view is a little less noticable than wikitables. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 19:57, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was not really a problem with FIFA World Cup either. [3] Zzyzx11 (Talk) 20:22, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stylized uniform template





Notre Dame

I created {{American football uniform}}, to mirror {{Football kit}} (i.e., soccer uniform), {{baseball uniform}} and {{basketball kit}}. I think it would be great to add stylized uniforms to the team template, as is done here: {{Infobox football club}} and here {{Infobox baseball team}}, to give a visual representation of the team colors. Rolando 07:50, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Helmet

The NFL Europa team infobox Template:NFLE_team has helmet linked to football helmet, does anyone object to the same being done here? 172.188.3.133 10:32, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Season links

Why doesn't this template provide a link (at least) to the current and a handful of previous seasons?

Many people would likely be checking when a player joined the team, what he did statistically last or in YEAR XXXX, or what the team did in a previous season against team xyz, etc. Hence, while unlettered and unlearned in the syntax to construct "2006 Pittsburgh Steeler season", they know how to reach "Pittsburgh Steelers" -- wherein we ought to make it easy to back link to the article covering said season.

Note links provide one handed navigation for those of us who like to browse and read lying back Roman banquet style while watching the tube! Typing two handed while lying on one's side isn't easy (and may be impossible--I certainly can't do it! <g>) but is a fun and relaxed way of browsing.

A sub-template of internal form Template:Catlist(edit talk links history) can be worked up given the earliest and final seasons as parameters, and do all the work... which would be presented as a set of links in table form by years end (e.g. 60 61 62 63 ... 07) and so forth similar to the calendar templates providing a nav boxed section so readers can navigate easily to the year of their interest.

The same template can then be used to provide the same set of links on the season's template for a team, giving a random access capability to readers as well. // FrankB 14:09, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The season links are not currently included primarily because this has been an infobox template, designed to present summary information about an article's subject, not a navigation template, providing a list of of links to several articles. The season links use to be on Template:New England Patriots and other similar navigation boxes, but were removed for some reason, [4] and then put on Template:New England Patriots seasons and others. I would prefer that you use that template instead of copying it on the infobox here. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 15:18, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uniform Images

Hello. I am the Silent Wind of Doom, and I am the creator of the uniform images that are used by all of the MLB baseball pages, as can be seen in each team's infoboxes. Well, last night, I finally finished my latest project, creating uniform images in the same style for the NFL. Here's a sampling.

		250px
Seattle Seahawks	Tampa Bay Buccaneers	Jacksonville Jaguars

I would like to now add these to the infobox. On the Chicago Bears page, you can see that they use a different template (I'll fix that as I add them) and the formatting has already been done, so I can quickly move that over and everything will be taken care of. I would have done this all myself, but the page said to first mention it here for debate. I'm glad I could help out the NFL pages, and please, if there's any issues with the images, whether there may be an inaccuracy or anything else, leave a message on my page and I'll fix it quickly as I can. --Silent Wind of Doom (talk) 13:19, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... Well, I'm not getting any response at all. It doesn't seem like anyone's patrolling this area. If there's no response here by tomorrow night, I'll simply implement the images. --Silent Wind of Doom (talk) 00:27, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oddly enough, this would be the reason why I came by here. You might try Wikipedia:WikiProject National Football League rather than the template talk page. Templates don't really get a lot of traffic, but the NFL wikiproject does. But in response to your question, I'm thinking the various current uniforms are an excellent idea for the template. Much better than just the current helmet image. --Bobblehead ^(rants) 21:49, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

General manager?

I think something needs to be done with this. Since each team has so may different executives/directors with many different roles, it's impossible to pin the title of "General Manager" on most teams, even those who have a GM. I think the field should be deleted, and the staff templates can speak for themselves as to who does what in each organization. Pats1 ^T/C 19:05, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Junk

For some reason, there's junk that appears on the top of pages that use this template: see San Francisco 49ers and Detroit Lions. Can someone clean it up? Thanks. -Oreo Priest ^talk 12:37, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks ok now. I think it was the result of someone experimenting with Template:NFLSecondaryColor. Cheers. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 15:29, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Helmet Logos

I have all the same helmets but in SVG... can i upload them and change the extension in the template? I will upload them with the same size as the old one and i will keep the same file name. Only the extension will be change. Thanks Kalel2007 (talk) 22:55, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adding a "current" parameter to {{NFL team}}

Anybody object to adding a "current" parameter to {{NFL team}}, similar to what is used on {{Infobox football club}}? For an example, see the bottom of the infobox for New York Red Bulls and the other MLS team articles. I ask because a couple of people are starting to enforce strict rules on the use of {{Current sport-related}} and the other Temporal templates. Cheers. Zzyzx11 (talk) 14:55, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, since I noticed that there have been a few reverts with the temporal templates, I went ahead and added the "current" parameter to {{NFL team}}. Feel free to change or comment on the formatting. Cheers. Zzyzx11 (talk) 04:32, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adapt for other football leagues

I am trying to adapt this for semi pro football use, but when I do, I can't get 'National Football League' to change to 'Mid Continental Football League' and I can't get the colors right. Any help on how to modify for other leagues use? Rick lay95 (talk) 01:00, 14 May 2009 (UTC)rick_Lay95[reply]

This template has been already adapted to other versions like Template:United Football League (2009) team, Template:NIFL team, and Template:Afbn team. An adaption requires good working knowledge of editing templates. Template:NFL team in its current form is a very complex template, with advanced features and parser functions. And it uses other templates like Template:NFLPrimaryColor and Template:NFLSecondaryColor to help display the colors. However if you look at the template code carefully, links to some article like National Football League and List of Super Bowl champions are actually hard coded into the template. I'm not sure if this helps, but examining the three other templates I mentioned could give you a start. Cheers. Zzyzx11 (talk) 04:11, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SVG helmets

This template needs to have support for SVG helmets, period. I tried implementing it, and it worked, but someone reverted me saying "screwed it up". -Zeus-^u|c 02:54, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I finally fixed it so the filename extension is not hardcoded. You can now fire away at any new logo files. Zzyzx11 (talk) 04:07, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The helmet parameter has now been made optional, in light of Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 October 9#File:Cleveland Browns helmet rightface.png. Zzyzx11 (talk) 15:58, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adding the secondary colors

I meant to do this last year, but I have now started to add instances of {{NFLAltPrimaryColor}} here to also generate the secondary team colors that are also used on {{Infobox NFL player}}. Should have some consistency. The other reason is that the team articles are more high profile and noticeable than the player articles, so several users were unaware of the secondary colors and changed {{NFLPrimaryColor}} in such a way that the colors from both templates clashed. Zzyzx11 (talk) 03:56, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal Change

Since the remove of the helmets I believe that the info box should have a change to it. I have a sample info box set under my user name and the code set up on my sandbox. I hope we could discuss this change, if possable in the near future.--Mr. Unknown (talk) 23:55, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We have now all the teams' wordmarks logos uploaded. These should instead probably be placed as a replacement for the helmets. Zzyzx11 (talk) 20:13, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Logo

Why is it that the logos in the infobox appears along the right instead of the center? Zappa O Mati 02:24, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I fixed it. This was probably another table cell alignment issue that has been popping up ever since the developers installed the most recent version of the MediaWiki software, with HTML5 coding capability. Cheers. Zzyzx11 (talk) 03:38, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MLB Infobox support of city or location

Hello, there is a discussion of city / location support (equivalent to this template) in which you might be interested, here: Template talk:Infobox MLB#City or Location support UW Dawgs (talk) 21:08, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Remove recent add_colors

A recent edit introduced "add_colors", in nominal support of additional, minor (tertiary?) accent colors. In my view, this change is unwarranted as the primary colors are already sufficiently supported. In the common case, each team is showing 2~3 colors in the Infobox. This new functionality is supporting colors (if any) beyond each team's common colors. For example, in practice for the Seattle Seahawks, it was used for "Gray - for pattern color on numbers & helmet only" and "Blue - for pattern color on numbers only" per citation, resulted in 4th, 5th, and 6th colors appearing in the Infobox. For the Rams, it showed the retro Blue and Yellow from the Los Angeles era. Therefore, I have reverted this content change for Seattle and others. UW Dawgs (talk) 02:54, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted it per step 2 of the WP:BRD cycle. I also oppose this, since this is overkill and trivial. And not many teams may have 4th, 5th and 6th colors. Zzyzx11 (talk) 03:45, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quick question

Just wondering if the same style (colored headers with borders) that appears on the NFL player infobox can be applied here, or if that's just overkill? I tried to see it myself on the sandbox, but I couldn't format it correctly (I'm not the best with wikicode) ~ Dissident93 (talk) 00:07, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New parameter request

I would like to propose a parameter addition to this, one I am surprised doesn't exist. I would like to see a founder parameter. Since most teams are no longer owned by the person who started the team, I think it would be a good addition to the infobox.--Rockchalk717 23:14, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's a key point readers want to know when they visit a team article. Should definitely be somewhere in the body. Per WP:INFOBOXPURPOSE: "The less information it contains, the more effectively it serves that purpose, allowing readers to identify key facts at a glance."—Bagumba (talk) 00:43, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Bagumba. It is an interesting fact, but it's not something most readers want to know. ~ Rob^Talk 21:18, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

centering section headers

Would anybody be opposed to centering the text in the section headers in this template? Right now they are aligned to the left, but I think we need to be consistent with other league navboxes (NCAA, NBA, MLB, etc.) and center the text. If no one opposes, I'll be bold and center it. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 04:08, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone ahead and implemented the change. You may need to purge your browser to see the change. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 22:28, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Section headers are not accessible

Section headers that use a team's brand colour for text are not accessible in dark mode. Please consider using the base content colour like the other headers in the infobox. See example from Green Bay Packers. JScherer-WMF (talk) 17:02, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Header style

Is there any reason to use the alt styles predominantly on the infobox outside of personal preference? The primary style matches the NFL player infobox too. I'd actually prefer if the headers alternated between the two but it doesn't work natively with rowstyle correctly. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 19:52, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]