Template talk:Medieval Horn of Africa

Africa: Djibouti / Eritrea / Ethiopia / Somalia

	Africa portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
	This template is supported by WikiProject Djibouti.
	Eritrea portal This template is supported by WikiProject Eritrea.
	Ethiopia portal This template is supported by WikiProject Ethiopia.
	Somalia portal This template is supported by WikiProject Somalia.

Middle Ages

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles

Criticism

This template is, frankly, a mess.

Several of these entries were never independent states -- they were, as far as the historical evidence shows, provinces of Ethiopia. Examples include Bugna, Delanta, & Wolqayt; in fact, these links do not connect to articles on the historical unit, but to articles on the modern geographical location sharing that name. (I'm unsure if there is enough information about the historic unit to be a stand-alone article.) Further, a number of these links are duplicates -- we have three links to the Kingdom of Damon, & two to the wars of conquest by the Imam Gragn. Lastly, a lot of these groupings tread upon controversial grounds where zealous but under-represented groups fight over what Wikipedia should say. While a good idea, there is little I would defend in this template; it is only a matter of when -- not if -- this becomes fodder for a Arbcom case, if they are bold enough to take on a content-related dispute. And, IMHO, only a body like the Arbcom could enforce a consensus on how this template should look & what it should contain. -- llywrch (talk) 01:00, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]