Template talk:License migration review
 | Template:License migration review is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here. |
Template-protected edit request on 7 January 2023
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please sync with sandbox per MOS:BLANKALT (the images on the left are fine to have unlinked, but the image on the right is not for licensing reasons). I have also made some while-you-are-at-it fixes (<br> to <br /> to help with syntax highlighters + Image: to File:) Thanks!HouseBlastertalk 03:47, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Done Also, Primefac should consider unprotecting the template since it's now unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:04, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- Given that this is part of the {{License migration}} family, is it not possible that it could be used? I feel like "parts of the whole" should match the protection of the primary template. Primefac (talk) 10:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
