Template talk:Library link by
Appearance
This template was nominated for deletion on 30 April 2013. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
RfC related to this template
[edit]There is and RfC at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Linking subjects to books at your local library (Forward to Libraries) that is related to this template. Users that are interested may wish to comment there. 64.40.54.57 (talk) 00:35, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 11 March 2014: Use protocol relative URL
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Since tools.wmflabs.org/ftl/cgi-bin/ftl website supports HTTPS, I suggest switching the link to protocol-relative URL. Here is the change. Thanks! Chmarkine (talk) 22:14, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Done Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:46, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Question: Chmarkine, Jackmcbarn; wouldn't it be more appropriate to just make it an internal link to toollabs:ftl/cgi-bin/ftl? — {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 23:56, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- I don't see why not. Jackmcbarn (talk) 00:02, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- @Technical 13:
Indeed. It is better to use internal link.Thanks for the idea! Chmarkine (talk) 01:42, 12 March 2014 (UTC)- One thing to notice is that if toollabs:A is used, then A is encoded automatically, so ? becomes %3F, and & becomes %26. Therefore, to my knowledge, it's impossible to pass parameters to that website. So I would suggest keep the current format. Chmarkine (talk) 04:56, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- @Technical 13:
External links to library resources: RfC
[edit]A Request for Comment on external links to library resources, which may impact this template, has started: Wikipedia talk:External links#RfC: External links to library resources. Opinions, knowledge, and suggestions are sought. Please join in. SilkTork (talk) 10:26, 3 July 2021 (UTC)