Template talk:Infobox caesium
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | This template was considered for deletion on 3 April 2012. The result of the discussion was "keep". |
Scientific notation?
[edit]Why are Teraseconds, Megaseconds, and Megayears used instead of scientific notation? Most other element infoboxes use the latter method for conveying half-lives. Fraxtil (talk) 23:59, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
- It looks simply as overlooked formatting, which I boldly changed to comply with other elements articles. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 00:25, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 22 December 2016
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Under "Most stable isotopes of caesium", Cs 134, Decay Products, it lists Barium 134 in the text, but the link pop-up dialog says Barium-124. This should read Barium 134. This change is merely a typographical fix. See below:
|- ! rowspan="2" style="text-align:right; vertical-align:middle;" | 134Cs | rowspan="2" style="text-align:center; vertical-align:middle;" | syn | rowspan="2" style="text-align:right; vertical-align:middle;" | 2.0648 y | ε | style="text-align:right;" | 134Xe |- | β− | style="text-align:right;" | 134Ba M medsker (talk) 14:13, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Done. Thanks for the report. -DePiep (talk) 15:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
