Template talk:ISO 15924 script codes and related Unicode data
Appearance
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Column changes
[edit]Unicode: Script description chapters
[edit]
About the chapters in Unicode text that describe the scripts (7–23).
- I have added a column that has an external link to the Unicode chapter pdf that describes the script. Like: Georgian (Geok) → Ch 7.7. There are minor diffirences, such as groupings, appearing in the chapters, in the Unicode textbook. Interesting, not fatal.
- Improvements are possible, for example re symbols, Z.... scripts (chapters 22, 23; which not all follow the regular "script"-handling), and presentational. -DePiep (talk) 15:48, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- See the extrra column. -DePiep (talk) 01:28, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Script directionality
[edit]I am working on this. Aim is to get these all in Wikidata. Then enwiki pull from there, whith 'overwride' option by enwiki parameter. -DePiep (talk) 21:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- In {{Infobox writing system}} and in this template {{ISO 15924 ... Unicode data}} I have removed {{ISO 15924 direction}}. Directionality is read from Wikidata, and can be set in the page by using
|direction=
. When set locally, no Wikidata is shown.
- {{ISO 15924 direction}} is deprecated and may be outdated (its data may be not updated). -DePiep (talk) 18:51, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- Could
{{ISO 15924 direction}}
be engineered to use Wikidata as its source instead? VanIsaacWScont 19:10, 10 February 2021 (UTC)- @Vanisaac: Smart idea! To consider: outside of the script-self-article, one needs the Wikidata script-qid (this template does, it's automated; in {{Infobox writing system}} it is an optional parameter, e.g., for when the Infobox is used in the language article (like here)). Will editors search for the qid?* Also name change needed ('Script direction'?). Sure we want to prevent any Update maintenance task.
- Do you have examples for usage? -DePiep (talk) 20:31, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- * Editor required to enter the qid, or an ISO id, or a specific English name. -DePiep (talk) 20:49, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- I would think it should use
{{ISO 15924/qid}}
to retrieve the Wikidata direction information from the 15924 code. That should match the current function that generates the script directionality from a #switch for each of the 15924 codes. VanIsaacWScont 21:02, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- OK, but that would require the article editor to use the ISO alpha-4 ID (or equivalent). Which is tricky business, they are hard to get right, and these are not that straightfwd eg with East Asian (Chinese) related scripts. I learned ;-). Where would this renewed template be useful? -DePiep (talk) 22:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- I would think it should use
- Could
Well, it is currently transcluded to 192 script and alphabet pages, so I would say those articles and other similar would be where the renewed template would be useful. VanIsaacWScont 00:55, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Now you lost me :-(
- That 192 was ~400 before I made the changes. IOW, mw is working on it (counting going down slowly, I'm fine). I am waiting to see where the old template actually is being used.
- More important: looks like you have no ideas on where & how this new template could be useful. Does not this make your question idle?
- My line of thinking is, that Wikidata should take care of the fact (well sourced, international), and any enwiki editors can easily overwrite locally (using
|direction=
). To me, this is a good line to spend my editing time on. -DePiep (talk) 01:20, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Unicode ranges for this script
[edit]Working on this, in Wikidata. Is not the same as "Unicode block" -- at all. Trying to get all ~200 scripts right, then enwiki can pull this from WD + local overwrite option. :-) -DePiep (talk) 21:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Row changes
[edit]Latn refinement
[edit]- About Latin script in Unicode Ch 7.1:
- I have started table {{Latn in Unicode}}, to get some overview & control of this topic. It's complicated! ;-) Later more. -DePiep (talk) 21:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Merge or split of scripts
[edit]- In the Venn diagram area: the table shows scripts merged (like Geok and Geor into U+'Georgian'), and split (like Hira and Kana into U+Hrkt). We are invited to describe those situations well. -DePiep (talk) 22:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)