This template is within the scope of WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of arthropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArthropodsWikipedia:WikiProject ArthropodsTemplate:WikiProject ArthropodsArthropods articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Perhaps the hymenocarines referred to as "odaraiids" (e.g. Pakucaris, Balhuticaris, Jugatacaris) can be included in their own division? Iezer (talk) 18:43, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
According to "A Burgess Shale mandibulate arthropod with a pygidium: a case of convergent evolution" (closed access) " So far no analysis has found a monophyletic odaraiid group including Odaraia." Hymenocarine taxonomy is a complete mess and highly inconsistent between analyses (it isn't even clear that the group as a whole or in part is even monophyletic). Even for subgroups like Waptiidae their validity is questionable, so I don't think adding more subgroups to the pile is a good idea, given the lack of consensus for them. Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:36, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
