This template is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this template or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
Hello all, I have two questions about this template. First, is the current organizing principle of listing active ingredients rather than commercially available combinations or products the most accessible way to design this template? I recognize that listing particular brand names is problematic given the global variety that exists, but most people are unlikely to be familiar with the names of individual active ingredients, so this template is likely to be useful only to medical specialists.
Second, the progestin section in organized by "generation". I am a PhD reproductive endocrinologist, and I am unsure what the categories of first, second, third, etc. generation mean. I am trying to add Segesterone Acetate to the progestin section and cannot find any documentation as to what "generation" this compound is. Is it worth considering removal or reorganization of these subcategories? Willmskinner (talk) 22:26, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
