Template talk:Harringay

Re-include Overview

I guess I have to accept what you've done to the box. For my money it's visually less appealing and I'm not sure it offers any improvements - but I don't want to get into a struggle over it.

However, I have added back the overview link. It's ok for Wikipedia habitues, but many people who use Wikipedia don't know all the tricks of the trade. Most people can work out that blue text means a link. But in this navbox it's not obvious. So relying on the history subtitle as a link to the overview page isn't effective, particularly when the other sub-head is not a link.

Hope you'll allow me this small change.

hjuk (talk) 14:12, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Harringay stations

Hi, I would like to note that templates (or any article, for that matter) shouldn't link to disambiguation pages. So, I would like to change the template somehow that would suit you, but won't link to Harringay Station. It's your call on how you think it's best to do this. Thanks! –Schmloof (talk · contribs) 03:38, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so they're separated, but how has that improved anything in any way? It's just made the list longer.hjuk (talk) 00:51, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]