Template talk:Glottolog

Template:Glottolog is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.

Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases.

Version 4.3

Glottolog is now at version 4.3, but the template still says 3.0. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 07:56, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We'd probably need to add support for allowing the template to be specified for the exact version used, and we'd probably also need to stop the infobox from automatically displaying this template after a Glottocode. – Uanfala (talk) 17:01, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Glottolog is now at version 4.6 and the template still says 3.0. ~Red of Arctic Circle System (talk) 08:53, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As of yesterday, we're at 5.0. This really needs to be updated. Straughn (talk) 13:48, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Need to update

chapterurl to chapter-url in book template. AManWithNoPlan (talk) 20:03, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 15 July 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change "Glottolog 3.0" to "Glottolog 4.6"
Change "2017" to "2022"
Add Sebastian Bank as an editor
Change Jena, Germany to Leipzig, Germany
See Template:Glottolog/sandbox for how this should look Arctic Circle System (talk) 08:35, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ping to @Kwamikagami: who may be more familiar with this. Wouldn't this need a parameter if this is used in refs though? People that referenced v3 shouldn't have their references changed, should they? — xaosflux ^Talk 12:46, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know that we've done a very good job with the various editions. The current use of the template is probably not all for ed. 3 as it is. So yes, I think an 'edition' param would probably be needed, but I think it's something that should probably be brought up at Wikiproject Languages. — kwami (talk) 11:41, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now Per kwami, this does not appear to be ready to go live as is. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:51, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]