Template talk:GANotice

Syntax

{{subst:GANotice|article=|result=pass}} ~~~~

{{subst:GANotice|article=|result=fail}} ~~~~

{{subst:GANotice|article=|result=hold}} ~~~~

Example

{{subst:GANotice|article=Article|result=pass}}

{{subst:GANotice|article=Article|result=fail}}

{{subst:GANotice|article=Article|result=hold}}

Your GA nomination of Article

The article Article you nominated as a good article has passed , see Talk:Article for eventual comments about the article. Good luck in future nominations.

Your GA nomination of Article

The article Article you nominated as a good article has failed , see Talk:Article for reason why the nomination failed. If or when this points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said artile. If you oppose this decission, you may ask for a review.

Your GA nomination of Article

The article Article you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. It hasn't failed because it's basically a good article, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be adressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail.

Someone please revert my stupid mistake!!!!

I tried to remove this template from somebody's talk page, and ended up blanking it! I'm not completely sure how to revert it. I really hope I didn't cause too much damage, it really wasn't intentional.--Grand Slam 7 16:55, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to revert it by copying and pasting the old diff, but it came out differently than it used to be. Here's why this happened: I passed Platte Canyon High School shooting as a Good Article and tried to put this template on Webdinger's talk page, as he was the nominator. However, I used "GANotice" instead of "subst:GANotice|article=Platte Canyon High School shooting|result=pass". It came out with all three results there, and I decided to remove the section from his talk page and write a sentence saying it passed instead fo using a template. I clicked on the edit button next to the template, thinking this would edit the section, and instead blanked the template. I am not sure how to fix it, although I tried, and I hope someone else can. I'm sorry about this, I really didn't mean to.--Grand Slam 7 17:23, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

After reading Help:Revert, I learned that reverting pages is not done by copying the text of the version you wish to revert it to (I had tried this earlier) and I was able to sucessfully fix it.--Grand Slam 7 21:04, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

I'm requesting a new version of the template, minus any hold, failed, or passed status. I generally like to introduce myself and inform users before I actually do the review, so a general intro template for GA reviewing would be nice. VanTucky ^(talk) 15:26, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Second Opinion Template

I think we need a template for letting nominators know that a second opinion has been requested, but the first review is up. Million_Moments (talk) 16:41, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you. Philroc (talk) 12:08, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Linking to the assessment subpage

It'd be nice if the basic form of this template linked to the subpage where the GA nomination is hosted. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 03:08, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to request the same thing. It seems really goofy that there's no link to the assessment page from this template. However, to actually make the edit, we'd need to make the Legobot source provide an assessment page number parameter, which I'm not entirely confident that it has when it's calling this function. jp×g 21:48, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of "reviewlink" parameter, 2022 January 1

I messed around with the sandbox a little, and came up with a modification that allows the template to be used more helpfully without affecting existing usage in any way. It works perfectly fine on all of the test cases. Basically, you can add a reviewlink parameter and the message will include a link to the actual review page; if you don't, it will continue to function the way it always did. jp×g 22:33, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]