Template talk:Foreign relations of Israel

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles

Project Israel To Do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Rate the Unassessed Israel-related articles and Unknown-importance Israel-related articles.
Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category and the tool's wiki page.
Collaborate : Participate in WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration.
Copyedit : Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in 2005
Deletion sorting : Participate in discussions at WikiProject Deletion sorting/Israel.
Expand : Ayala Procaccia, Diamond industry in Israel, Edna Arbel, Levin Kipnis, Rami Kleinstein, Sephardic Haredim, Zman Tel Aviv, Nachum Heiman, Public Defence (Israel), Prisoner of Zion, Trial of Benjamin Netanyahu, Day to Mark the Departure and Expulsion of Jews from the Arab Countries and Iran, Pre-Modern Aliyah
See also Articles needing translation from Hebrew Wikipedia.
Geographical coordinates : Add geographic coordinates to Israel articles missing geocoordinate data.
Infobox : Add infoboxes to Israel articles needing infoboxes.
Maintain : See Israel articles needing attention.
Map : See discussion at Module:Location map/data/Israel. Add maps to articles in Wikipedia requested maps in Israel.
NPOV : Jewish exodus from Arab and Muslim countries
Photo : Add pictures to articles in Wikipedia requested photographs in Israel.
Stubs : See Israel stubs.
Update : Basic Law proposal: Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People
Other :
- Translate to Hebrew : David Bar-Hayim, Guy Bavli, and Guy Oseary.

International relations

This template is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles

Standard format

In a effort to standardize foreign relations templates, this template got a "collapse" function as it has got very big and many specific topics not necessarily belong in this template. --Randam (talk) 09:47, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think it looked a lot better before. Separating it out makes it feel lopsided, and doesn't make it any easier to navigate. I would recommend reverting it to the previous organization. TimeEngineer (talk) 01:10, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Flushing Girl and Randam: Can we please discuss this? The new format just looks terrible and is less useful imo TimeEngineer (talk) 17:56, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree Mr. TimeEngineer, we should revert it back to the original format or just get rid of the collapsible groups. That's what I think should happen. Just probably get rid of the collapsible groups. Flushing Girl (talk) 22:16, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Both. Humans can never reach an unanimous decision on what's the 'most comfortable' way to navigate, as it is a 'matter of taste'. However, humans can discuss what grouping is logical and consistent. Having groups likes "Africa", "Asia", "Europe" next to "Peace Agreements" and "multilateral" is not logical, but a "taste".

Secondly, when templates get bigger, they get a collapse function. Similar to templates of Brazil, India, France, Philippines, Russia, United Kingdom and many others. I disagree that the current format is more lopsided than the previous format. Because the other non-bileteral groups were snowed under the bileteral group. Flushing Girl (talk) 00:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TimeEngineer is correct. We should have gotten rid of the collapsible groups from this article. I mean nothing is wrong here. If the format is restored then good. I mean those countries you cited are very powerful ones and are even members of BRICS and the G7. Flushing Girl (talk) 22:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Flushing Girl: I think we are in full agreement. Please feel free to revert the template to the previous version. TimeEngineer (talk) 01:18, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]