Template talk:Famine in India
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Backdoor deletion
[edit]Backdoor deletion by redirecting it is not ok. That is against Wiki rules. AFD can be used instead. Crashed greek (talk) 12:27, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
- I have reverted too Crashed greek. The portrayal of these famines in drama belongs in this template and there isn't a suitable reason to remove Deccan famine of 1630–1632. LearnIndology (talk) 16:07, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
- Both the initial edits and the revert seem in good faith, just differing template-arrangement concepts. In my experience templates usually contain media about a topic if available, either in a few entries if there aren't too many or in overall links such as Statue of Liberty in popular culture while also linking prominent examples. I don't know if this is a part of a guideline or not, but makes sense so readers interested in the principal topic can learn more about how it has impacted overall society. Randy Kryn (talk) 21:30, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
- I feel the same way Randy Kryn, which is why I restored the Media section. Nice to see you here, LearnIndology (talk) 04:17, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
- Both the initial edits and the revert seem in good faith, just differing template-arrangement concepts. In my experience templates usually contain media about a topic if available, either in a few entries if there aren't too many or in overall links such as Statue of Liberty in popular culture while also linking prominent examples. I don't know if this is a part of a guideline or not, but makes sense so readers interested in the principal topic can learn more about how it has impacted overall society. Randy Kryn (talk) 21:30, 28 July 2021 (UTC)