Template talk:FAPath

Order of path

Shouldn't the Peer Review be before checking against the FA criteria? — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 17:50, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, because before submitting to peer review an article should have already been checked against the FA criteria. Peer review's purpose is for other editors to make sure it fits what they think constitutes the FA criteria. — † Webdinger ^{BLAH | SZ} 02:30, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article?

I think maybe getting the article to Good Article status should be in there somewhere before the FA step. Any comments? Voyaging^(talk) 23:20, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]