Template talk:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style
 | This template was considered for deletion on 18 June 2012. The result of the discussion was "no consensus". |
Request edit
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add the following: <noinclude>Please see [[Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Archive_129#Edit-page_header]] for an explanation of this template</noinclude> D O N D E groovily Talk to me 03:15, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- This seems unnecessary. Apart from anything else, there is no template here, so you would be linking to an explanation of something which does not now exist ... — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:45, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- This template was (and is) nominated for deletion by a user who had no idea what it was. A simple explanation would prevent this in the future. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 02:29, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
I didn't see super much harm in adding a hidden comment, so I did that. —Kusma (t·c) 06:38, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
- That's what edit summaries are for ;) The HTML comment is not needed. Anyway, disabling request as this seems to be resolved. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:51, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Spelling
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please correct it's to its (two places, first and third lines). It's is a contraction for it is, and its is the possessive of it. Thanks Apteva (talk) 02:07, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- True, so
Done. --Redrose64 (talk) 14:36, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
not needed
[edit]can we remove this? I'm not sure what it adds. If you are editing a guideline page, you dont' need to quote wikipedia policy; as you are literally in the process of making policy (or, at least, making a guideline) - so you don't need to refer to policy when suggesting a change.--Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 21:30, 19 November 2013 (UTC)