Template talk:Did you know/The Throne

The Throne, Otis (song)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk)

~~... that The Throne released "Otis" and "H•A•M"?~~

The hook isn't mentioned in the articles; in fact, the release dates are given as over 6 months apart in the respective articles. If the hook was supposed to mean that they will be on the same album it is rather confusing (especially as the album isn't one of the nominated articles). Yomangani ^talk 16:58, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've clarified the hook. Rcej (Robert) – talk 03:36, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ALT1:... that "Otis" was released from The Throne? Rcej (Robert) – talk 09:21, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook

Length, format, content rules: See above.

I like ALT1. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:40, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Source: Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:40, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Interest: It doesn't seem hooky at all. The rules require a hook to be "interesting, catchy, punchy". Could you sift through the article for a better hook? Tony (talk) 08:25, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not bad with ALT1. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:40, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image suitability, if applicable: None. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:40, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ALT hooks, if proposed:

Article

Length: Throne Tony (talk) 02:42, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Both are fine. Otis is huge (and surprisingly rated a start class) Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:40, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vintage: Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:40, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sourcing (V, RS, BLP): Throne Tony (talk) 02:42, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Otis needs some Bare URLs cleaned. The Throne is fine. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:40, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality: Throne Tony (talk) 02:42, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Both look fine. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:40, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism/close paraphrasing: Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:40, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Copyvio: : Is there any particular reason why the use of clips from "Otis" and "H.A.M." in The Throne are valid fair use?
Obvious faults in prose, structure, formatting: Throne Tony (talk) 02:42, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments/discussion: Tony, you're great, but 'Throne' isn't adequate feedback. Could you please elaborate? Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 02:11, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe the "Article" review section should be duplicated for this double-nom? --PFHLai (talk) 13:10, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Almost there, just needs some cleanup of the BURLs. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:40, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. I think I got them all ;) Rcej (Robert) – talk 02:36, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BURLs are gone. Good to go. Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:44, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]