Template talk:Did you know/The Nature of Mind
The Nature of Mind
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Crisco 1492 (talk)
- ... that "The Nature of Mind" begins by asserting that "men have minds"?
- Reviewed: Pangani Longclaw ([1])
Created by DrJimothyCatface (talk). Nominated by Rcej (talk) at 09:13, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook
- Length, format, content rules:
- Source:
see comment below - Interest:
- Image suitability, if applicable:
- ALT hooks, if proposed:
Article
- Length: --Antidiskriminator (talk) 11:49, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- Vintage: --Antidiskriminator (talk) 11:49, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- Sourcing (V, RS, BLP): see comment below
- Neutrality:
- Plagiarism/close paraphrasing:
- Copyvio:
- Obvious faults in prose, structure, formatting:
Comments/discussion:
Most of the sources are to the essay itself. Are there any secondary sources that discuss the essay? If not, the article may not be notable. Christopher Connor (talk) 01:34, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
The only source for information about the topic of this article is the topic of this article. I am afraid that without third party reliable sources this article could be seen as WP:OR.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 11:50, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry Christopher Connor, I just noticed your above comment suggesting the same thing.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 11:54, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
After 10 days article is still cited almost entirely to the essay. Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:41, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
