Template talk:Did you know/Matthew Callahan Log Cabin
Matthew Callahan Log Cabin
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk)
- ... that the Matthew Callahan Log Cabin (pictured) is one of the few such structures left in Aspen, Colorado?
- Reviewed: Eugenics in Singapore ([1])
- Comment: Probably the thinnest of my Aspen NRHP articles that I've submitted here, but I do think this fact is hook-worthy
Created by Daniel Case (talk). Self nom at 04:35, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
You have three almost totally uncited paragraphs in the "Building" section. Gatoclass (talk) 13:59, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
- All the building paragraphs describe, other than those aspects specifically cited, is what's visible in the image. Per what I strongly believe is implied by WP:OI, any text that imparts information also imparted by an accompanying image does not need to be cited. Daniel Case (talk) 21:48, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
- I can't confirm all that detail from the photograph (which is very dark). Anyone else have an opinion on this one? Gatoclass (talk) 13:30, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
- A few details are indeed hard to confirm from the image alone, e.g. that the windows are single-pane, or that the picture shows the eastern elevation of the house. Maybe such detail is not really necessary. How the immediate environment looks like, and how old the other houses are, can certainly not be concluded from the image and should be supported by a ref, or left out. --Pgallert (talk) 10:40, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
- I will be working on this. Daniel Case (talk) 22:20, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Done I have added a link to Bing Maps Bird's Eye view of the neighborhood to support these, and taken out the text the image would not support. Daniel Case (talk) 04:45, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- I will be working on this. Daniel Case (talk) 22:20, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
- A few details are indeed hard to confirm from the image alone, e.g. that the windows are single-pane, or that the picture shows the eastern elevation of the house. Maybe such detail is not really necessary. How the immediate environment looks like, and how old the other houses are, can certainly not be concluded from the image and should be supported by a ref, or left out. --Pgallert (talk) 10:40, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
- I can't confirm all that detail from the photograph (which is very dark). Anyone else have an opinion on this one? Gatoclass (talk) 13:30, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Verified. Gatoclass (talk) 12:22, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
