Template talk:Did you know/Kiever Synagogue
Kiever Synagogue
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know, unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted
- ... that the building of the Kiever Synagogue took three years to construct?
- Reviewed: List of knot terminology ([1])
5x expanded by Vale of Glamorgan (talk), Jayjg (talk). Self nom at 04:42, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
- ALT1... that Kiever Synagogue was the first building of Jewish significance to be designated a historical site by the province of Ontario?
Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook
- Length, format, content rules: Tony (talk) 02:21, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- Source: Tony (talk) 02:21, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- Interest:
I'm sorry to say it fails the interest test, to me. There are other more interesting facts ... even: architecturally unique ... was the first building of Jewish significance in Ontario to be ... (might have to move the ref tag if that's the hook).Tony (talk) 13:07, 25 July 2011 (UTC) Tony (talk) 02:21, 27 July 2011 (UTC) - Image suitability:
- ALT hooks, if proposed:
ALT1 is good! Tony (talk) 02:21, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Article
- Length: Tony (talk) 13:07, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- Vintage: 6 days, the tool says (18 vs 24 July), but who's quibbling over a part-day. Tony (talk) 02:21, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- Sourcing (V, RS, BLP): Tony (talk) 13:07, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- Neutrality: Tony (talk) 13:07, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- Plagiarism/close paraphrasing: I'm OK with most of these duplicated strings, although you might take a look at one or two, putting them in your own words. I'm new to cp reviewing. Tony (talk) 02:21, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- Copyvio: Tony (talk) 02:21, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- Obvious faults in prose, structure, formatting: Bit overlinked: I fixed. Tony (talk) 13:07, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Comments/discussion:
- Thanks for the feedback. I've proposed an alternate hook (ALT1 above) along the lines you've suggested, and added sources. Jayjg (talk) 01:47, 27 July 2011 (UTC)