Template talk:Did you know/Fantasy Studios

Fantasy Studios

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk)

... that Fantasy Studios was built on profits from hit songs by Creedence Clearwater Revival?

Reviewed: Pilbara Toadlet ([1])
Comment: This article was moved from user's namespace on July 26

Created by Skallikat (talk). Nominated by Binksternet (talk) at 04:28, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook

Length, format, content rules: Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Source: Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Interest: Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image suitability, if applicable: None. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ALT hooks, if proposed:

Article

Length: Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Vintage: Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sourcing (V, RS, BLP): References are almost bare URLs. A couple parts, like the last paragraph of Today, are uncited. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutrality: Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Plagiarism/close paraphrasing: Looks fine Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Copyvio: Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious faults in prose, structure, formatting:

Comments/discussion:

A couple referencing issues, then this is golden. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I put up some more references. Binksternet (talk) 14:11, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Still lacking (Studio C, and Studio D have unreferenced paragraphs; Studio D and Studio management have unreferenced paragraphs). I still see some BURLs too. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:25, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, references are beefed up and bare URLs are handled. Binksternet (talk) 16:10, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I hate to be a drag, but there are still some unsourced statements. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:46, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I, too, see some unsourced statements but nothing that sticks out as controversial or extraordinary. I also see that the paragraphs are cited in accordance with the extra DYK rule of thumb #D2 that one reference should be in each paragraph, as a minimum. Yes, I can keep working on this article but I would rather spend my time on other articles. Binksternet (talk) 02:21, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to check out. If another editor feels uncomfortable with the sourcing, feel free to overrule this tick. Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:35, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]