Template talk:Did you know/Editio Octava Critica Maior

Editio Octava Critica Maio

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk)

... that Tischendorf's Editio Octava Critica Maior and Westcott-Hort's text were sufficient to make the Textus Receptus obsolete for the scholarly world?

ALT1:... that acrrording to Kurt Aland Editio Octava Critica Maior even a century later was still of value for scholarly research?
ALT2:... that the critical apparatus of Tischendorf's Editio Octava Critica Maior is still used by some textual critics?
Reviewed: David Baker (poker player, born 1986) ([1])

Created by Leszek Jańczuk (talk). Self nom at 01:20, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook

Length, format, content rules: Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:56, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Source: Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:56, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Interest: I especially like the obsolete hook. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:56, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image suitability, if applicable: None. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:56, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ALT hooks, if proposed:

Article

Length: Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:56, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Vintage: Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:56, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sourcing (V, RS, BLP): Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:56, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutrality: Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:56, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Plagiarism/close paraphrasing: Most heavily cited sources are PD. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:56, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Copyvio: Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:56, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious faults in prose, structure, formatting:

Quite a few one sentence paragraphs. Could that be fixed? Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:56, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments/discussion:

Almost. Just need to address the micro-paragraphs. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:56, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 13:23, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks better. GTG. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:53, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]