Template talk:Did you know/Battle of Pakchon
Battle of Pakchon
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk)
- ... that although the 3rd Battalion, Royal Australian Regiment halted the advancing Chinese 117th Division during the Battle of Pakchon (5 November 1950), the inexperienced Australian battalion commander was later relieved of his position?
5x expanded by Anotherclown (talk). Self nom at 04:54, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook
- Length, format, content rules – OK Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 21:39, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- Source – AGF Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 21:39, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- Interest –
- Image suitability, if applicable – OK Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 10:55, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
- ALT hooks, if proposed –
Article
- Length – OK Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 21:35, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- Vintage – Nice expansion. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 21:35, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- Sourcing (V, RS, BLP) – OK Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 10:54, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
- Neutrality – OK. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 21:35, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- Plagiarism/close paraphrasing – no evidence Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 10:54, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
- copyvio (files) – OK Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 10:54, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
- Obvious faults in prose, structure, formatting –
Comments/discussion:
It looks good, but I will continue my reviewing. The article is really long. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 21:40, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Looks good. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 10:54, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
