Template talk:Did you know/Arthur Seymour

Arthur Seymour

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk)

... that the actions of Arthur Seymour (pictured), 4th Superintendent of Marlborough Province in New Zealand, contributed to the capital of the province shifting from Blenheim to Picton and back to Blenheim?

Reviewed: Nazi talking dogs (diff)
Comment: The review is from some time ago.

5x expanded by Schwede66 (talk). Self nom at 20:25, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:

Hook

Length, format, content rules: --Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:33, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Source: --Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:33, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Interest:--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:33, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image suitability, if applicable:--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:33, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ALT hooks, if proposed:

ALT1 ... that the actions of Arthur Seymour (pictured), 4th Superintendent of Marlborough Province in New Zealand, contributed to the Seat of Government of the province shifting from Blenheim to Picton and back to Blenheim five years later?
ALT2 ... that the actions of Arthur Seymour (pictured) contributed to the Seat of Government of the Marlborough Province, New Zealand, shifting from Blenheim to Picton and back to Blenheim five years later?

Article

Length:--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:33, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Vintage:--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:33, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sourcing (V, RS, BLP):--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:33, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutrality:--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:33, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Plagiarism/close paraphrasing:--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:33, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Copyvio:--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:33, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious faults in prose, structure, formatting:

Comments/discussion: I'm happy with the proposed ALT hook. Schwede 66 01:02, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Both of these hooks are way too long. Anyone have any other suggestions? Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 20:16, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ALT2 is under 200 characters. Schwede 66 23:49, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ALT2 looks decent. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:58, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do we still place ticks these days, so that those who move hooks to prep can easily spot those that have been approved? Schwede 66 20:56, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but I didn't because Sturmvogel was the one who reviewed it and I thought s/he should do it. Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:30, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Based on Sturmvogel's review above. Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:36, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some wikicodes are missing in the nom template for the above hook. Can someone put them (back) in before getting this hook promoted to prep, please? Thanks. --PFHLai (talk) 11:15, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:47, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for fixing this, Crisco. --PFHLai (talk) 18:54, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]