Template talk:Di-no license-notice

Template:Di-no license-notice is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.

Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here.

Interwiki

{{editprotect}} Please change interwiki link of vi:Tin nhắn về bản quyền hình to vi:Thiếu giấy phép-tb. Thanks. Vinhtantran (talk) 01:32, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the tag for now, as the interwiki page you link to does not exist. Please check the link and add the tag again once you've found the right page. Happy‑melon 10:40, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect comment

The template currently contains the comment . It should instead contain . Algebraist 16:18, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. This page has a really bizarre history... --- RockMFR 22:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Using the template

How is this template used? I've created it on cy, but each time I go to use it with {{Rhybudd delwedd dim trwydded|example.jpg}} and then try to edit the section, it goes to the template..... Help?! -- Xxglennxx (talk • cont.) 04:04, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Link to IUP?

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Per discussion at User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise#User:Mariocrossing1, shouldn't this template and the related ones have a link to WP:IUP so that recipients of the warning have information that will assist them in learing about when it is appropriate to use copyrighted images on Wikipedia and what documentation needs to be provided when such images are used. Mjroots (talk) 08:22, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't specify where you wanted the link so I've added a sentence at the bottom. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:26, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PS, why didn't you do this yourself? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:27, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Be WP:BOLD you mean? I wasn't sure whether or not this would be a good idea, and I didn't want to interfere with a highly used template without some discussion first. I've added the text to the related templates. Mjroots (talk) 11:43, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, being bold is not much different from adding {{editprotected}} and asking another admin to be bold on your behalf ;) We generally don't use {{editprotected}} as a tool to gather opinions. If you are not sure about whether an edit is controversial, you could just let the proposal stand for a few days and if no one objects, make the edit yourself. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:21, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Images, copyright etc aren't my strongest point. In this case, there was no harm in asking first. Mjroots (talk) 16:44, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 22 March 2019

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please remove the line <noinclude>{{pp-template|small=yes}}</noinclude> - protection templates are automatically handled by the documentation page. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 06:34, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:51, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]