Template talk:Contradiction inline

Merge with Contradict-inline

Done

It would be great to merge this with {{Contradict-inline}}. It's particularly annoying that these are different templates since their names doesn't give any clue about the particularity of each. --Chealer (talk) 19:36, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The documentation says clearly that this template is for contradictions within the same article. {{Contradict-inline}} is for contradictions between articles (which is why it has an "article" parameter. Debresser (talk) 20:19, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We merge redundant templates routinely. The then-current {{contradict inline}} template was useless and malfunctional if not given an explicit parameter pointing to another article. By giving it sane default behavior - referring to the current article – that makes it 100% redundant with the {{contradiction inline}} template, so I'm merging them. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 18:44, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge completed, with additional new features that help people identify the nature and location of the conflict, and ensure proper categorization (including when people use the template on non-mainspace pages, or flag conflicts between mainspace content and non-mainspace content, e.g. source discussions on the talk page). The merged template is (as of this writing) at Template:Contradict-inline, and this template now redirects there. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 20:45, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Template talk:Contradict which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:14, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]