Template talk:Christian crosses

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles

Systems

	Systems science portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
	This template is not associated with a particular field. Fields are listed on the template page.

Visual arts

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Heraldry and vexillology

Template:Christian crosses is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Heraldry and vexillologyWikipedia:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyTemplate:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyheraldry and vexillology articles

Sectioning

What's "in Modern use" and what's "historical" possibly borders WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH. Wouldn't we rather go with some sectioning of "Western", "Eastern", possibly with a couple of few selected subsections such as "Latin Church", "Protestant", "Eastern Orthodox" and "Oriental Orthodox"? PPEMES (talk) 16:08, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, although some might be more general in use. Also, Uniates as well as Protestants in Eastern Orthodox-dominated lands may be using the Eastern Orthodox crosses. Go ahead and section them out better if you like.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 17:54, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but couldn't you go on in which context first conceived? I couldn't think of any less imperfect solution. PPEMES (talk) 18:51, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Many of the imgs were highly detailed and thus almost illegible at the 19px display size used here, so I uploaded a bunch of simplified designs. They all have the same line weight (apart from where they flare) so they harmonize well. But flory and budded variants still aren't very distinct, so suggestions for improvement welcome. — kwami (talk) 00:22, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]