Template talk:Catholic mysticism
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Catholic mysticism redirect. |
|
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Catholic mysticism. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this redirect. You may wish to ask factual questions about Catholic mysticism at the Reference desk. |
 | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Template:Christian mysticism was copied or moved into Template:Catholic mysticism with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
From Template:Christian mysticism
[edit]@Jujutsuan: Dervied from Template:Catholic mysticism, please contribute here instead. Chicbyaccident (talk) 18:23, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
- I think it's a little premature for this. It might be taken by other editors as aggressive. Jujutsuan (Please notify with {{re}} talk | contribs) 18:24, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not sure about that. Rather those how wish to contribute to the former template in other ways are free to do so without intervention. Nontheless, in the meantime, this proposed perspective does remain encyclopedically relevant, don't you think? Chicbyaccident (talk) 18:27, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, it is relevant, but let's see how the RM over at the original ends first. No need to go transcluding a truly redundant template. Right now they're exactly identical. Jujutsuan (Please notify with {{re}} talk | contribs) 18:31, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
- Not exactly identical, but that's fine. Let's see about the other discussion. Chicbyaccident (talk) 18:35, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, it is relevant, but let's see how the RM over at the original ends first. No need to go transcluding a truly redundant template. Right now they're exactly identical. Jujutsuan (Please notify with {{re}} talk | contribs) 18:31, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not sure about that. Rather those how wish to contribute to the former template in other ways are free to do so without intervention. Nontheless, in the meantime, this proposed perspective does remain encyclopedically relevant, don't you think? Chicbyaccident (talk) 18:27, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Since the RM failed...
[edit]@Chicbyaccident: I found the motherload! Category:Christian mysticism, Category:Christian mystics, Category:Roman Catholic mystics. I'm going through and adding the relevant articles to this new WP:SUBPOV template. When it's ready we can paste it into Template:Catholic mysticism instead of redirecting it. Jujutsuan (Please notify with {{re}} talk | contribs) 18:20, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Jujutsuan: I'm not sure I understood your message. Anyway, there currently seems to be a banner on the top of its page about merging this template. I don't know how promoted this, but I object. Having a Catholic such template will not make the Christian one worse. Chicbyaccident (talk) 10:52, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyright history
[edit]Since this template was created from the Template:Christian mysticism, the edit summary of the first edit should have given credit to that template, in order to meet the related poicies of Wikipedia. tahc chat 15:35, 14 July 2016 (UTC)