Template talk:Campaignbox Peninsula Campaign

Military history: North America / United States / American Civil War

This template is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

List structure

To clarify a bit: in semantic terms, the list of the Seven Days' Battles is, indeed, a continuation of the preceding list rather than a separate listing it its own right:

                                        |--   Seven Days' Battles   --|
... Hanover Court House · Seven Pines · Oak Grove  · ... · Malvern Hill

The bolding is merely a visual effect, and strictly speaking isn't necessary to indicate the relationship between the items. If I'm not mistaken, the standard nested list format is therefore the appropriate one here. Kirill ^{[talk] [prof]} 02:58, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. The bolding is just coming from the ambient styling of definition list terms (";"). On British people I used {{nobold}} on some DTs. I've also argued for just overriding the bold for all DTs under class=hlist. This is all changing pretty fast, so there's some thrashing. Alarbus (talk) 03:04, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. The new layouts look very nice, but, as you say, any change of this magnitude is going to involve some temporary chaos. Kirill ^{[talk] [prof]} 03:07, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks (re the looks). The big test template ATM is {{The Holocaust}}; discussed at template talk:navbox#Another hlist construct to consider. I've a large number of campaign boxes and such watched. I see a lot of people showing up after the hlist switch-over and they seem to find the new format much more approachable and easier to update. This is hitting on several good issues: semantics, reduced server load (millions and millions of {dot} not being preprocessed), and easy of editing. 03:28, 17 December 2011 (UTC)