Template talk:Australian politics/party colours
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Template:Australian politics/party colours is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit extended-protected}} to notify an administrator, template editor or extended-confirmed editor to make the requested edit. Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here.
|
This template was considered for deletion on 25 January 2022. The result of the discussion was "no consensus". |
One Nation colour
[edit]I am very happy to work towards a colour here that works for all. My main concern is that the colour is sufficiently different from the Democrats' colour (and also ideally from NXT, although that's less important). I personally think the brownish colour isn't bad as many media outlets have used brown to identify One Nation for years, although I am fine if someone more skilled than I wants to make it slightly less brown. Frickeg (talk) 05:51, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Democrats colour | Colour I changed from | Current colour |
---|---|---|
The colour you've assigned to the right-wing party Pauline Hanson's One Nation is very similar to that assigned to the centre-left Australian Labor Party as well as those assigned to the various left-wing socialist parties on the list. I doubt any of the latter would consider it appropriate to assign One Nation a similar shade to their own parties, as though they were somehow related.
Why not use the partys' colours as listed on each party's main Wiki pages instead? They're these:
Democrats | One Nation |
---|---|
If those colours are already assigned to another party, at the very least shouldn't a similar shade be used rather than one chiefly associated with a group of political factions it disagrees with?
1.127.110.76 (talk) 19:21, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
1943 Liberal Democrat vs Liberal Democratic Party vs Libertarian Party
[edit]@Frickeg when editing to make the LDP colour different from the Libertarian Party colour, I included the other line for Liberal Democrat (not realising it was different); @Frickeg reverted the changes to keep the 1943 party separate, but that inadvertently makes it once again the same as Libertarian. I have re-edited to make all three parties different. Hope that is okay. Sgryphon (talk) 11:04, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Sustainable Australia
[edit]Is there a reason why they currently use dark green as their Wikipedia colour? Their website, their logo, and the main colour they use in backgrounds is dark blue. Catiline52 (talk) 07:30, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- So here's the thing with this. These colours do not need to be, and often should not be, the exact colour that the party uses. Colours have implications in politics, and we also have to keep in mind that we are using them here as distinguishing features so they need to be adequately different from each other (see the One Nation discussion above).
- Sustainable Australia's colour is green because their main focus is environmental. The specific shade was chosen to ensure that it is sufficiently distinct from the Nationals and the Greens. Blue is the colour of conservatism, and that has nothing to do with this particular party. Furthermore, especially with micro parties, the colours they use are so poorly known (and may even change between elections - see, for example, this very party's branding back in 2010) that it is far more important to convey information with the colour than to match the colour they currently use.
- So consider this a protest against the recent trend, generally undiscussed, towards matching colours exactly with a party's current branding. These colours are primarily about improving readability, and that should come first. Frickeg (talk) 10:47, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 19 March 2022
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add the following colour for Fusion Party (Australia). Colour is on the first listed on the wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_Party_(Australia) Afinno (talk) 10:14, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- i.e. Please add colour #9A94E7 as the colour for Fusion Party Australia. Afinno (talk) 10:31, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Teal Independents
[edit]Despite the name the Teal Independents aren't usually represented with teal but with the same colour as other independents. Could someone fix that for me? Micmicm (talk) 09:30, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 31 October 2022
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add line for Freedom Party of Victoria as follows: |freedom party of victoria=#800000. Colour taken from party website 180.150.36.68 (talk) 06:48, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Not done: It's already there as
freedom=#9E0000
, which is the shade of blue shown on Freedom Party of Victoria. 3mi1y (talk) 07:38, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 13 March 2023 (2)
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Australian Federation Party
Please delete colour 538A2E
Please add colour E3A02D Glennstapo (talk) 18:08, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Done Thanks! Have confirmed this colour is the colour used on Australian Federation Party, so making the substitution here. Lizthegrey (talk) 18:16, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Animal Justice Party
[edit]Should the AJP's colour be changed from #A22C2E to #5C2C86? This is the colour they've started using since late last year - other media also now using it
https://vic.animaljusticeparty.org/
(see all parties): https://www.abc.net.au/news/elections/vic/2022/results/party-totals
Totallynotarandomalt69 (talk) 06:12, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 5 February 2024
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I wish to have an "Independent United Australia" for the current United Australia Party (formerly Palmer United) option added to the list of colours/styles as there are Council candidates running who are members of the UAP and as such should be listed as Independent United Australia with the correct colour and a link to the Party page. Comfisofa (talk) 05:41, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Shadow311 (talk) 19:43, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Free Trade Party & Anti-Socialist Party Colour
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
As far as I can tell, these party colours were implemented many years ago, when having maps was less of a concern. With the recent addition of maps for early Australian elections, I feel that the garish green colours have readability issues for maps. The difference can be seen here for the 1901 Election and the 1906 election. The first of which uses the proposed colour, and the second uses the current colour.
Furthermore, as a liberal party that was focused on the issues of free trade, a yellow colour, which is associated with liberalism, would fit this party well. The period in which these two parties were active (1887-1909) would mean that there would be no confusion with other parties that would have similar colours (The Democrats, Democratic Labour Party) due to those coming much later than these two parties. I've displayed the proposed colour below.
Free Trade, Independent Free Trade, Anti-socialist & Independent Anti-socialist:
Current colour | Proposed colour |
---|---|
Proposed changes:
|free trade|anti-socialist=#BFFF00 -> |free trade|anti-socialist=#FFD425
|independent anti-socialist=#BFFF00 -> |independent anti-socialist=#FFD425
|independent free trade=#BFFF00 -> |independent free trade=#FFD425
MsCosmicAsh (talk) 16:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Colours for National Party (Queensland, 1917), Queensland United Party, and Civic Reform
[edit]Currently the Queensland United Party and National Party are listed with different colours (#87CEEB and #6495ED respectively), despite being the same party (the National Party in Queensland having renamed itself to the United Party in 1923). As #6495ED is used for other Nationalist parties, the United Party colour should be changed to be consistent with this.
Additionally, as the Civic Reform League that contested Brisbane City Council elections was not the successor to the National Party/United Party (this being the National Citizens Party), 'civic reform qld' should not share the #6495ED. Though separate from the Civic Reform Association that formed in Sydney, the colour used for this party (#00A2FF) could be used.
United Party | National Party |
---|---|
Proposed changes:
|united=#87CEEB -> |united=#6495ED
|civic reform qld=#6495ED -> |civic reform qld=#00A2FF