Template talk:Application ARM-based chips

big.LITTLE chips

To remove duplication, chips using two different types of core in a big.LITTLE configuration should only be listed under one. I propose that they're listed under the "big" core, since the "LITTLE" cores are only used as low-power cores compatible with the "big" cores. --Imroy (talk) 23:16, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

i have removed the Kirin 950 from the a53 list according this comment, also i have added few models Unknowcontributor (talk) 12:01, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with doing this, but, currently the A-55 is only used in the same places as the A-75, consequently there is some duplication here for the moment so the A-55 can appear in the template. Without any list of where they appear they disappear from the template. I think it's better to have this small amount of duplication for the time being so that the A-55 can be seen. When the time comes that they are used on their own this duplication can be removed. 86.153.162.136 (talk) 02:50, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would consider merging 8.5 and 9.0, 8.6 and 9.1, etc.

As ARM itself groups these pairs together as they have the same new extensions.

ARM Developer page about the extensions

Another reason is: the current order suggests a wrong ordering. For example 8.7 is actually newer than 9.0. Homei (talk) 00:34, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]