Template:GAN/list/sandbox

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Well Written

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct:

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

Verifiable with no original research

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

(c) it contains no original research:

(d) it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism:

Broad in its coverage

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic:

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

Neutral

• Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

Stable

• Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

Illustrated

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

Overall

Well-written
Verifiable with no original research
Broad in its coverage
Neutral
Stable
Illustrated

This is the template sandbox page for Template:GAN/list (diff).
See also the companion subpage for test cases.

Template documentation[view] [edit] [history] [purge]

This template is preloaded into a new GA review to provide step-by-step instructions (as hidden text), which can be found at {{GAN/instructions}}. It can be configured to resemble {{GAList}}, {{GAList2}}, {{GATable}} or {{GAProgress}}; to remove the instructions; or to delete itself.

Usage

{{subst:GAN/list |overcom= |1a= |1acom= |1b= |1bcom= |2a= |2acom= |2b= |2bcom= |2c= |2ccom= |2d= |2dcom= |3a= |3acom= |3b= |3bcom= |4= |4com= |5= |5com= |6a= |6acom= |6b= |6bcom= |7= |7com= |instructions= |mode=}}

mode

See below for examples. Can be set to:

compact or GAList to make the template resemble {{GAList}}
expanded or GAList2 to make it resemble {{GAList2}}
table or GATable to make it resemble {{GATable}}
progress or GAProgress to make it resemble {{GAProgress}}
none or delete to delete the template
empty or any other value to get the default output

instructions: Set to yes to enable hidden text with instructions. Any other value disables the instructions.

Parameters ending in -com: For comments on the individual GA criteria, with |overcom= for opening remarks and |7com= for concluding remarks.

All others

Status indicators that take one of these values:

y, yes, pass, good, ok, k, +, aye all produce a pass symbol:
n, no, fail, bad, nk, -, nay all produce a fail symbol:
?, ??, ???, dunno, question, huh all produce a question symbol:
wtf produces Wikipedia's "I am out of my comfort zone" symbol:
hold and on hold produce the on hold symbol:
neu, neutral and und produce the neutral symbol:
blank or no input produces the unassessed symbol

In vertical format:

{{subst:GAN/list 
| overcom = 
| 1a = 
| 1acom = 
| 1b = 
| 1bcom = 
| 2a = 
| 2acom = 
| 2b = 
| 2bcom = 
| 2c = 
| 2ccom = 
| 2d = 
| 2dcom = 
| 3a = 
| 3acom = 
| 3b = 
| 3bcom = 
| 4 = 
| 4com = 
| 5 = 
| 5com = 
| 6a = 
| 6acom = 
| 6b = 
| 6bcom = 
| 7 = 
| 7com = 
| instructions = 
| mode =
}}

This template should always be substituted since the GA criteria are reviewed from time to time and this template may change.

Examples

Setting Output

|mode=compact or GAList

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

|mode=default

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a. (reference section):

b. (citations to reliable sources):

c. (OR):

d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a. (major aspects):

b. (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

|mode=expanded or GAList2

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; the spelling and grammar are correct:

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations or plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio?
A. Media are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

|mode=table or GATable

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.

|mode=progress or GAProgress

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Prose and MoS:
Ref. layout, reliable sources, OR, copyvio:
Broadness and focus:
Neutral:
Stable:
Media:
Overall:

When |mode=compact or progress, the comments for each sub-criteria (e.g. 1a, 1b) are listed under the main criterion (1).