Template:Did you know nominations/social projection
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:16, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Social projection
- ... that social projection may explain political polarization? [1]
Created by RMS-SRL (talk). Self-nominated at 22:06, 7 December 2020 (UTC).
- New enough; moved from sandbox on Nov. 30, ten days before DYK nom. Long enough; over 1,500 characters (15,512 characters). As far as I can tell, within policy; has citations, but I'm unable to check for neutrality and plagiarism because many sources are behind firewalls, so I'm AGF. Hook fine, although it may be a little too short. No QPQ needed because user's first DYK. Side note: article depends a bit too much on primary sources, but given the topic and the fact that this is a school project, I think it's fine for DYK.
Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 23:25, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- New enough; moved from sandbox on Nov. 30, ten days before DYK nom. Long enough; over 1,500 characters (15,512 characters). As far as I can tell, within policy; has citations, but I'm unable to check for neutrality and plagiarism because many sources are behind firewalls, so I'm AGF. Hook fine, although it may be a little too short. No QPQ needed because user's first DYK. Side note: article depends a bit too much on primary sources, but given the topic and the fact that this is a school project, I think it's fine for DYK.
References
- ^ Van Boven, Leaf; Judd, Charles; Sherman, David (2012). "Political polarization projection: Social projection of partisan attitude extremity and attitudinal processes". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 103 (1): 84–100. doi:10.1037/a0028145.