Template:Did you know nominations/iPhone 7

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  MPJ-DK  01:15, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

iPhone 7

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that the iPhone 7 was criticized for not featuring a headphone jack?

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Pac-12 Conference Men's Basketball Coach of the Year

5x expanded by ViperSnake151 (talk). Nominated by Donnie Park (talk) at 13:33, 13 September 2016 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Review for the QPQ stated was done in Feb 2016. Nominator to kindly clarify and confirm this since it is very difficult to verify old QPQ now. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 19:19, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

• AKS.9955 I thought it was okay since I was going to have articles nominated but couldn't get them done over the last few months due to loss of motivation. Donnie Park (talk) 20:37, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

• Donnie Park. Even I don't know of any criteria that says QPQ should be done within some specified time-limit (unless I missed it). All I was keen in finding out was if that DYK review holds good as QPQ for this nomination. I have had a look at your DYK credits around the time and did not see this review being mentioned anywhere. Passing this DYK. Cheers, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 07:15, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

• The QPQ used seems to have been also used here. The nominator should provide a different QPQ for each nomination (unless QPQ was of a multi-nom). Donnie Park could you please provide another QPQ. Also, too AKS.9955 you can use this tool to see if a QPQ has been linked from another nomination. - Yellow Dingo (talk) 11:24, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

• Yellow Dingo I thought I could reuse it if it's from a failed nom as I had before per Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Archive 119#Is it allowed to reuse reviews for QPQs if a nomination has been (correctly) rejected? Will it possible to pull the QPQ off the failed nom as it was closed before I could make an attempt? Other than that, I could provide another. Donnie Park (talk) 11:51, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

• @Donnie Park: Ok as there seems to be prior consensus I guess it's fine. Sorry for the inconvenience, restoring green tick: . - Yellow Dingo (talk) 11:56, 19 September 2016 (UTC)