Template:Did you know nominations/bioRxiv
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:08, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
bioRxiv
[edit]- ... that in the second year after the launch of the bioRxiv repository, biological preprints hosted on it were tweeted about over 20,000 times?
- Reviewed: (Gösta Peterson)
Created by Headbomb (talk). Self-nominated at 18:03, 11 September 2016 (UTC).
Article is new enough, long enough and within policy regarding neutrality, sourcing and lack of close paraphrasing / copyvio issues. Earwig does detect a violation, which is related to a list of categories covered by the site, and is not reflected in the text of the article. The hook is within length, interesting and properly sourced. QPQ obligation has been met. Alansohn (talk) 17:42, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
