Template:Did you know nominations/Zunera Ishaq
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 14:25, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Zunera Ishaq
[edit]that the fiery debate that intensified and became increasingly divisive during the 2015 Canadian federal election campaign, centred on Zunera Ishaq's successful legal challenge of the ban on wearing the niqāb during her swearing in ceremony to become a Canadian citizen and ended when the Liberal party won the election and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau chose to not politicize the niqāb?
- ALT1:
In her first act as Justice Minister, Jody Wilson-Raybould, officially withdrew any challenge to Zunera Ishaq's rights and added that the policy of the Liberal government was to respect values such as diversity and inclusion that define Canadian identity. - Comment: The User:Oceanflynn personal sandbox article was created on October 10, 2015, the userspace draft template was dated by User:Ricky81682 on November 25. User:Zanimum reviewed it on December 20 and kindly suggested it was ready to publish! So I did on December 21! User:Zanimum also suggested the article be submitted to DYK!
- ALT1:
Created by Oceanflynn (talk). Self-nominated at 18:59, 22 December 2015 (UTC).
Note: the first two hooks were struck because they were over the limit of 200 characters.
- ALT2: ... that Zunera Ishaq's legal challenge to wear the niqāb during her citizenship ceremony became an election issue in the 2015 Canadian federal elections?
- ALT3: ... that a legal challenge by Zunera Ishaq resulted in allowing the niqāb to be worn while taking the Canadian Oath of Citizenship?
Two shorter hooks above. -- Zanimum (talk) 13:20, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
- This article is new enough and long enough. Both ALT2 and ALT3 are acceptable and well-cited. The article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:33, 7 January 2016 (UTC)