Template:Did you know nominations/Zaki Khan
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Allen3 talk 14:59, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Insufficient progress toward resolving outstanding issues
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Zaki Khan
[edit]- ... that Zaki Khan, a Persian general and aspiring Shah, went so far in his atrocities that his own men murdered him?
- Reviewed: Mogiła Abbey.
Created by Susuman77 (talk). Self nominated at 21:54, 28 July 2013 (UTC).
- Comment. If this is your first DYK submission Susuman77 you do not need a QPQ review (#5). However, your question about an alternative hook at Mogiła Abbey has been answered. Thanks in advance, Poeticbent talk 15:15, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Susaman, the article is long enough and detailed enough. Its a good summary of the history (although I had/ve no knowledge of this bit of history). The problem is that DYK has a rule that at least every paragraph needs a reference. This reference should ideally include the page number, but I think this is only essential for contentious facts and for the atrocities you mention in the hook. Actually there is little detail of what/when/how/where these atrocities happened. Could there be some more detail? I hope this helps. Do not worry you have a few days to achieve this. Do ask if you need help or feel that you are being asked to do anything unreasonable. best Victuallers (talk) 11:44, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Two-and-a-half weeks since nominator notified of issues and no evidence of any efforts to correct problems. Nominators edit history shows a pattern of editing for a day or two and then disappearing for three to nine month stretches. With this pattern of behavior there is no reason to believe nominator will return and correct issues in a time frame acceptable to DYK. --Allen3 talk 12:02, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
